The Internet of Things is still relatively conceptual. Many of the solution companies that claim to be Internet of Things are using the Internet of Things banner to defraud government subsidies. From the current situation, many companies use a bunch of low-end sensors and then collect data into the cloud, which is called the Internet of Things. The use of real users does not bring convenience to them. Instead, it increases the amount of maintenance work and is of no value to users.
Sensors are the factors that hinder the development of the Internet of Things?
Is the future of the Internet of Things meaningless? This is not the case. The Internet of Things can bring convenience to users in the context of perfect systems. The main factor hindering the development of the Internet of Things is the sensor.
At this stage, the price of high-end sensors is relatively expensive, and there are tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of them. There is no way to commercialize them. The low-end sensor is almost useless, not only is the data accuracy low, but the reliability is extremely poor, requiring frequent manual maintenance. If the data needed for the Internet of Things is not accurate, what is the significance of the data?
At present, the direct use unit is a government unit, but the number of solution companies is numerous, the Internet of Things projects are scattered, the data everywhere is scattered, there is no way to integrate these data, and the value of many data is not particularly large. Some Internet of Things used by government units need to be truly connected in series with the whole country. The various departments are connected to each other, and data can be used interchangeably and mutually utilized to generate big data. Real data connectivity is not possible in the short term.
The main factors affecting the cost of the sensor?
1. At present, the sensor market is dominated by foreign companies. The domestic market is mainly to do some low-end products, and the sensors are really done very little, leading to market monopoly.
2, the relevant core components can only be provided by foreign countries, such as some LED light sources inside the sensor, PD, motor and the like, the domestic related industry chain is not mature enough. As a result, domestic material costs are high.
3. Sensor companies can't see much benefit in the short term. Sensors are more dispersed. The unit price of individual sensors is low. In some related industries, if you are working on a project, don't research and develop it yourself, and you can easily build a project with millions of thousands. Ten thousand, the money is relatively fast, and does not require too much technology, resulting in fewer companies that are willing to invest in human resources and resources.
For the industrial market, the development of the Internet of Things needs to have certain norms, otherwise it will be difficult to develop and grow. For the civilian market, it is mainly cost and user experience. In the huge Internet of Things market, everyone wants to share a piece of the pie. If they are speculative, they will only stink the industry. Really hope to pay attention to the value of users, first of all to stabilize the product, do a good job, do cheap, so that the market will grow.
Optical Filter,Long Wave Pass Filter,Optical Pass Band Filter,Bandpass Filter
Danyang Horse Optical Co., Ltd , https://www.dyhorseoptical.com